Search

22 Nov 2006: The finalsystem shows state-of-the-art performance over a range of test sets. ... This approach was not found to perform reliably across differ-ent types of test data.

23 Feb 2002: to the query before running the standard BRF technique on the test collection. ... The query expansion was performed on the union of the test and the parallel text collections.

27 Sep 2000: VTLN warping in training and test both for GI and GDmodels for full and reduced bandwidth coding. ... 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We would like to thank BBN for providing the MiniTrain trainingand MTtest test set definitions.

21 Sep 2006: A detailed report of this test can be found in ourprevious work [10]. ... 20.2 fps).Figure 3 illustrates the recognition process on a typical test-ing clip.

2 Mar 2000: The experiments reported here use the TREC-7 SDR test data. For this evaluation, the audio documents came from American broadcast radio and TV news programs which had been manually divided ... The five systems described in section 4.3 were evaluated on

3 Nov 2023: Still, there remains a significant performance gap between the English and the cross-lingual test sets. ... One possible approach to this problem uses sub-character decomposition for training and test sentences.

13 Aug 2008: In addition tobackground additive noise convolutional distortion was added to test set C. ... For all SNRsand test sets gains over the optimised VTS scheme were obtained.

20 Feb 2018: 1 Introduction. Speaking tests for assessing non-native speakersof English (NNSE) often include tasks involvinginteractive dialogue between a human examinerand a candidate. ... Williams, Kai Yu, Steve Young,and Maxine Eskenazi. 2011. Spoken dialog

20 Feb 2018: Table 3Percent of unseen contexts in the test data. Number of matching features. ... Noduration modification was applied for this test. Twenty subjects participated in the evaluation.

30 Mar 2000: This contains the TREC-8 SDR test collection period (Feb 1st to June 30th 1998). ... For development, the 100 hours of TREC-7 SDR test data was used.

5 Oct 2000: All experiments were performed on the test sets used in the September 1998 and March 2000 Hub5 evaluations (eval98 and eval00, respectively).. ... It can be seen that for the eval00 test set the unmapped posteriors perform much better than for the eval98

20 Feb 2018: Reducingthenumber of system components leads to a simpler architecturethat iseasier to implement and test. ... Table 4. Analysis of detected speech segments using V2 and A2models on noisy test setGM2b.

20 Feb 2018: Section 4 presents the results of bothobjective and subjective tests. Conclusions then follow. ... 4.2. Subjective listening tests. The previous objective measures show useful comparison infor-mation.

14 Jun 2004: This was to simulate conditions in the RT-03s evaluation, where there was a temporal gap between the test-audio and the training shows. ... To help minimise the cost of computing the BIC statistics at every point, a faster Hotelling's T test is first

14 Sep 2010: All three test sets, A, B and C,were used for evaluating the schemes. ... This work used three of the test sets containing digit. sequences (phone numbers).

25 May 2004: Test setseval03 6h set from Fisher and Swb2-5 data, 72 conversationsdev04 3h set from Fisher, 36 conversations. ... WER on eval03, fsh2004sub models, unadapted, 2003 trigram. Test with adaptation in P1-P2 system:.

21 Feb 2022: Automate (English) spoken language assessment & learning• without simplifying/limiting form of test: “free speaking”• possibility for richer, interactive, tests• desire to assess communication skills. ... 4/45. Spoken Language Assessment &

20 Feb 2018: During the control tests, each site taking partin the challenge was asked to find test volunteers. ... Table 2. Overall performance for the Lets Go! spoken dia-logue challenge control tests.

8 Mar 2000: For speech transcription problems with widely varying speaker, channel and background conditions, such as broadcast news transcription, it is beneficial to include unsupervised test-data adaptation to individual speakers and data ... The inter-node costs

22 Jun 2007: Table 3 shows the P1-P2 perfor-mance3 of these baseline models on the BC and BN tests sets. ... Table 6. Unadapted %CER onbcmdev05. The models were then evaluated on the BC test set,bcmdev05.

12 Apr 2005: For MLLR mean adaptation, a. SystemAdapt Test Set WER (%)Config eval03 dev04 dev04f. ... This system wasevaluated on botheval03 and dev04 test sets and comparedwith the SATDIAGC system.

20 Feb 2018: The set of possi-ble values for each slot was different in the test set, which alsoincluded extra slots. ... A summary of the difference between thesmaller training domain and extended test domain of DSTC3is given in table 1.

20 Feb 2018: The aim of this test was to formally evaluate the reduction of breathiness observed in TE speech following glottal source replacement. ... All subjects were naïve raters, unfamiliar with TE speech. Results of the pair-wise perceptual tests are

16 Jun 2008: During recognition the following procedure is used:1. Compensate the acoustic models for the test noise con-. ... dition2. Recognise the test utterance Y to obtain 1-best hypoth-. esis, h = h1,. ,

20 Feb 2018: Altogether 21 listeners, 11 native and 10 non-native,participated in the listening test. ... Statistical significance tests were performed assuming a bino-mial distribution of each choice.

31 Mar 2005: NIST,. ''Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT),''.

20 Feb 2018: For the test material 30 sentences froma tourist information enquiry application were used. ... This same text materialsas the above preference test were used for all the below.

15 Aug 2007: Thispaper shows that multistyle models benefit from VTS compensationor Joint uncertainty decoding by reducing the mismatch betweentraining and test. ... Figures are reported against thedev03 test set encompassing3 hours of shows from six different news

13 Jul 2004: NIST,. Benchmark Tests : Rich Transcription (RT).

2 Nov 2000: The full HUB-4 1997 evaluation test set was used to assess language model performance. ... Treating this as the baseline result to improve upon, statistical significance was tested by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at a 5% significance level..

13 Jun 2013: As the test data was Levantine Arabic,there is little appropriate data for training language models. ... Forthis work all the clean Levantine Arabic transcriptions, exclud-ing the dev1 test data, was used.

7 Oct 2001: The final HTK system designed from the results of these experiments yielded an overall word error rate of 22.0% on the 1996 unpartitioned broadcast news development test data and just ... but if the (small) test collection is used, then average precision

20 Feb 2018: 1. English STC baseline tested on the English test set asreported in [6]. ... Table 2: BLEU scores [?] over the test set translated usingGoogle Translate and Moses.

21 Feb 2022: Business Language Testing Service (BULATS) Spoken Tests. • Example of a test of communication skills A. ... Use automatic grader • for grading practice tests/learning process • in combination with human graders. •

2 Mar 2000: During system development the BNeval97 test set was used. 4.1 Increased Acoustic Training Data. ... All these sources excluded data from the designated test epochs. This corpus was denoted LMtrain98.

24 Jul 2003: Baseline Acoustic Models: Results (I). • Development test setsBNeval98 two 1.5-hour data setsBNeval02 1-hour data setBNdev03 three hours of TDT-4 data from Jan ’01 transcribed by STT sites. • ... MLE baseline system– Add 3rd derivatives HLDA,

9 Aug 2005: This is restrictive in practicein that test data may contain distortions that take it outside the strict ambit of the trainingpositives. ... This can be computed in terms of likelihoods. (1)so then the test becomes (2)where.

20 Feb 2018: There were in total47 distinct semantic slots. To parse a test sentence, it was first preprocessed to apply thesame lexical class substitution as used in training, then aligned toeach of the ... 4.2. Results. The Y-clustering approach was tested using

23 Jun 2005: data when processing all the test data togetheror 8.6% when processing the test data shows independently. ... The previous experiment was repeated adding the test dataitself, E, instead of the dev data.

20 Jan 2007: All the test sets comprise ofshows where a show is a broadcast of a TV or radio program. ... 3.4. Results. The tests were carried out on a BC test set (dev05bcm: 3 hours,30k words, 5 shows) and two BN test sets (eval04: 1.3 hours, 11kwords, 3

28 Apr 2005: increasing mixtures.• Obtain prob from each SU subtype GMM for each feature vector in test data.• Place GMM probs on arcs of lattice and decode as usual. ... Initial GMM results for dev03f test set:. SYSTEM DEL INS SUBS %Err.

23 Oct 2023: B = 1, otherwise. is a margin parameter. At test time the a single image is used to obtain its embedding vector and find thenearest neighbour in the database of the embedding ... Only the the deconvolution layer parameters are trained. Test use. At test

17 Oct 2000: standard clean modelset and then to perform further adaptation for the actual test data [7]. ... For the evaluation test H3-P0 data one microphone was selectedby NIST for each speaker.

9 Aug 2005: The test-set wassubjected to the same preprocessing steps as the training corpus. ... The OOV rate for the describedvocabulary is 0.62% on the test-set.

16 Sep 2003: 357 female sides (23.75hrs), only 142 male sides (9.43hrs). • Same test setup as for 20hr QT expts. ... MPE gain is larger than MLE gain. • Gains larger on female test data (biased training).

27 May 2004: During training and test adaptation, a global in-terpolation weight was estimated and separate speech and silencetransforms were used for CMLLR. ... Using ST for test adaptation again yieldedabout the same as a GD system with CMLLR.

20 Feb 2018: Two tailed z-tests at the 95% confidence levelwere used to test the statistical significance of the differencebetween the success rates. ... The use of the AMT workers is substantially more efficientwhen compared to a controlled test.

19 Nov 2010: The two forms of modified tail distribution modelling were inves-tigated on the 1998 Hub4 partitioned evaluation test set. ... The test was performed on a subset of the 1997 par-titioned evaluation that was used for development [4].

21 Nov 2019: Automate (English) spoken language assessment & learning• without simplifying/limiting form of test: “free speaking”• possibility for richer, interactive, tests• desire to assess communication skills. ... 4/45. Spoken Language Assessment &

Yu, S. Young, M. Eskenazi (2011). "Spoken Dialog Challenge 2010: Comparison of Live and Control Test Results. "