Search

3 Aug 2004: the items at test andmust determine from which specific source each origi-nated. ... remained the same across study. and test; open boxes show theresponse when the items were.

30 Apr 2012: Inter-ference effects on test performance were only seen in the recall task. ... ERPs were recorded during a memory test while partic-ipants either selectively recalled a specific associated memory.

28 Jan 2020: At test, participants recreated the features of studied objects using a continuous response dial. ... In typical laboratory tests of episodic memory, participants’performance is measured using categorical response options, forexample by asking a

3 Apr 2017: Key words: anterior cingulate cortex, conflict-monitoring, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, neuropsychology, Wisconsin CardSorting Test. ... shape). A third test itemshared neither color nor shape with the sample item.

19 Oct 2016: executive functioning.Memory was measured using tests from the BIRT (Brain InjuryRehabilitation Trust) Memory and Information Processing Battery(BMIPB; Coughlan et al., 2007) and the Warrington recognitionmemory test (RMT) (Warrington, 1984).

3 Aug 2004: Test formats changesource-monitoring decision processes. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1137–1151. ... L. (1998). Therole of prefrontal regions during tests of episodic memory.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2,

18 Jan 2008: These word-pairs wereused as target items in the study and test phases. ... In ad-dition, 80 naturally occurring and 80 man-made objectwords were used as baseline items in the test phase.

14 Jan 2002: 7. Experiment 1a: testing autobiographical memory insemantic dementia using a detailed Crovitz test. ... matched control subjects, on tests tappingword production and conceptual knowledge (e.g.Graded Naming Test [61], category fluency, word-pic-ture

17 Dec 2004: No mentionwas made of a later memory test. Each sentence lasted approximately 4 s,after which the screen went blank. ... in this situation indicating that performance of the two groupsdiffered significantly on the parameter under test (Dodson, Prinz-metal

19 Jul 2003: Procedure. Across 16 scans, eight study-test cycles were adminis-tered to subjects. ... Results. Behavioral data. Behavioral data from the test phase are presented inTable 1.

27 Jul 2005: 1996); Wisconsin Card Sorting Test(Berman et al. 1995); reasoning tasks (Goel, Gold, Kapur, & Houle, 1997);intelligence tests such as Raven’s Progressive Matrices (Christoff et al. ... 2004). D. Rostral PFC lesions do not necessarily cause impairments

18 May 2016: Group-level ac-tivation was determined by performing one-sample t tests on the linear contrasts of thestatistical parametric maps (SPMs) generatedduring the first level analysis. ... Note: Chance 33.33%. Error bars indicate SEM.p 0.05, p 0.005,

12 May 2009: Kvavilashvili et al. (2003)did not have an initial assessment for a test–retest. ... Two studies did ground their conclusions about long-term re-tention of flashbulb memories on the results of tests–retests.

8 Jun 2015: These words were divided into nine16-item lists that served as stimuli in the study and test phases ofthe experiment. ... Procedure. The experiment consisted of six study-recall blocks followed bya recognition test at the end of the session.

18 Mar 2013: Test trials were presented in a pseudorandom order with no morethan two repetitions of the same experimental condition. ... During the test phases, participants were pseudo-randomly cued to make context memory or semantic control decisions aboutstimuli.

14 Jun 2006: Because some statistical tests involved relatively smallsamples, all p values for chi-square tests were calculatedusing exact tests implemented in SPSS Exact Tests 7.0 forWindows (Mehta & Patel, 1996). ... These tests are reliableeven when sample sizes

25 Oct 2005: 3. Source monitoringThe depth of processing manipulation also formed thebasis for a subsequent source decision at test. ... 447. During the test phase, subjects made a recognition andthen a source response to each presented word.

8 Oct 2021: In total, participants completed ninestudy-test blocks over nine functional runs (one studyand one test phase per run). ... sec) for the retrieval trials, capturing theduration of the study and test displays, respectively.

1 Aug 2003: 3a), as do those patients with predominantly temporal lobe damage who also performpoorly on tests of frontal lobe function63–65. ... Forexample, will activation of similar networks at encodingdetermine subsequent retrieval when memory isassessed using

17 Nov 2015: A test of therevised model with non-significant terms eliminated against aconstant-only model was statistically significant, indicating thatleft hemisphere PCS length reliably distinguished betweenhallucinating and non-hallucinating patients (w25.848

3 Apr 2017: Participants were told to try to learn the appearance ofthe objects on the background as best as they could in prepar-ation for a memory test on the object features. ... Figure 1. An illustration of the task design, showing a series of displays learnt

4 Dec 2013: This is a computerized analogueof the Wisconsin Card Sort Test from the CANTAB battery. ... The statisticaltests were carried out using IBM SPSS 18.0 statistical software,and two-tailed tests were used throughout.

29 May 2013: Knowing that it is impossible to assessmeaningfully the experience of an animalthat can’t talk, Clayton and Dickinson(1998) developed a behavioural test basedon the original definitions of episodicmemory as involving

3 Sep 2007: condition. In order to test formally for whether the regions activated. ... for each participant. The resulting correlations were entered. into one-sample t-tests to test for consistent results across.

8 Jun 2015: To study both errors of omission and errors of commission,psychologists have often used a test–retest methodology. ... According to Fisher’s exact test, those who tookSurvey 1 only or Surveys 1 and 2 could not be considered as twogroups.

22 May 2006: These estimates were entered intothe second stage of analysis treating subjects as a random effect, using a one-sample t-test across subjects. ... To test this possibility, a second analysis wasconducted including RT as a parametric modulator to

12 Sep 2023: attention layer network (simple-3D-MHL) were used to train and test the prediction of the presence of the paracingulate sulcus. ... To train, validate and test our. explainable framework, we used a comprehensively annotated cohort of 596 subjects from

5 Feb 2013: Theseestimates were entered into the second stage of analysis treat-ing subjects as a random effect, using one-sample t-tests across. ... 1997), Dux and Marois (2009). Paired samplest-tests comparing T2 accuracy for fearful vs.

26 Apr 2004: AD, as indicated by a significant t test on information type for thisgroup, t(14) 4.31, MSE 0.065, p. ... a significant t test on informationtype for this group, t(20) 6.61, MSE 0.032, p.

28 Jan 2010: A sec-ond possible explanation for the divergence between neuroimag-ing and neuropsychological findings is that the tests used forneuropsychological assessment are relatively insensitive to theabilities supported by MPFC [see Burgess

11 Dec 2009: Eighteen of these six-word lists were assigned to each of the four test conditions for each participant. ... Finally, as a test of internal consistency, we examined the correla-tion between criterion and confi dence in DRM false memories, the signifi

19 Jun 2019: Table 1. Participant Data. Healthy ControlsClinical Hallucinations. Nonclinical Hallucinations Test Statistic P Value.

3 Sep 2007: Some studies have found mixed results. Usingdata from the Consortium to Establish a Registryfor Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) word listmemory test (Morris et al., 1989), Moulin et al.(2004) found that ... 04), althoughnone of the t-tests reached

3 Nov 2006: This appearance was confirmed by a Kolmogorov--Smirnoff test on the distribution of absolute x coordinates,showing that it differed significantly from a unimodal normaldistribution (P < 0.01).

4 Jan 2022: Annual Review of Psychology. Brain Mechanisms Underlyingthe Subjective Experience ofRememberingJon S. Simons,1 Maureen Ritchey,2. and Charles Fernyhough31Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom;email:

22 Feb 2006: To test for brain– behavior relationships in baseline conditions,we used a simple RT task as a baseline, in which participantssimply pressed a response button every time the screen flashed(with

20 Mar 2019: Abbreviations: H: Hallucinations; NH: No hallucinations; L: left; R: right.a The jackknife sensitivity analysis tests the reproducibility of significant brain regions by iteratively repeating the statistical analysis, but systematically excluding