Search

1 Apr 2005: Furthermore, we excludedtdt4 data after 15 Jan-uary 2001 so not to have temporal overlap of acoustic or languagemodel data with the development test sets. ... The resultsstill showed consistent gains over various test sets. Finally we usedthe

9 Aug 2005: The fronto-parallel view reveals how the inter-section tests can be performed efficiently.

28 Jul 2005: As a test,EPZS was applied to synthetic data of the same form as used in Figure 4, where much higherstrains were simulated.

9 Aug 2005: citation words, number sequences and prose passageswere used, with one quarter of the data ( 1500 phonemes) setaside as a test set. ... 6. RESULTSResults for both phoneme and word recognition over 50 test utter-ances with.

9 Aug 2005: " $#%& " ' )(. # ,-. /. 0214365785:9<;1>=?=?@A9B@. " DC E&F'GHE&IIF. 0J78KLKM@ANLOQPROS7T1>5UKLV:W X<7YOLOS@[Z<O1OS]:@_257Y>@[NKL7TOa<1Bb;cPdXeWN7?Z:9B@bf1BNgOQ]:@hZ:@A9BNL@A@1Bb021jikO1BNg1Bbl+]78=T1>KM1Bm ]na. "!#$!&%(')!,-"./&!%1032546%879')7%1":;

9 Aug 2005: ¤! "#. ]Bzv /bxeuv]s#za#m0bqBc0u6jtl%atcm$ bxeuv]OÀYevebfatc]bfwÖ]bfewWj#ceu}aYc0u6bdug]zvYeryYwuugj%'aYcym. free hingefixed hinge. residual displacements. test break location.

16 Mar 2005: Further details andan implementation of the K-S test can be found in [27]. ... 10. 20. 30. 40. 50threshold for KS test statistics. threshold for KS test statistics.

9 Aug 2005: Text. wfreq2vocab. Vocab. Test text. Perplexity. Id N-gram. LanguageModel. text2idngram. idngram2lm.

9 Aug 2005: high-noise test speechunknown utterance from. high-noise speech. 10 hmms modelling. adjusted set of. ... each state known. cepstral means in. mse. normalised. accumulate. digit-dependentdigit-dependent. noisy test.

10 Jan 2005: nist.gov/speech/tests/rt/rt2003/spring/docs/rt03-spring-eval-plan-v4.pdf , 25th February 2003. ... 3] NIST, “Fall 2004 Rich Transcription (RT-04F) EvaluationPlan,” http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/rt/rt2004/fall/docs/rt04f-eval-plan-v14.pdf , 30th