Search

21 Jul 2015: We would hope that the reforms to the 14-19 curriculum will, in due course, obviate the need for additional tests. ... We would welcome discussion of the economics for us of continuing work to increase fairness in admissions in the broader sense outlined

21 Jul 2015: Topic:. Response to UCAS/DfES Curriculum Development Group discussion questions on the 14-19 Education white paper. ... Recipient:. UCAS/DfES Curriculum Development Group. Date:. June, 2005. Document:. Cambridge Admissions Office.

8 Jul 2015: Date:. Tuesday, 5 February, 2013. The Advanced Subsidiary or AS Level examination was introduced in September 2000 as part of Curriculum 2000. ... Curriculum 2000 was primarily designed to increase flexibility and choice for students.

21 Jul 2015: These include. the Key Stage 3 Curriculum review, a system of diplomas, reviewing GCSE coursework and. ... teams to work on the development of curriculum pathways in mathematics for 14-19 year.

8 Jul 2015: Asian. A1. Medicine. 25.7%. L1 Economics. 9.7%. G1 Maths. 8.6%. A2 Dentistry. ... 65.8%. Black. A1 Medicine. 22.4%. M1 Law. 13.6%. L1 Economics. 6.7%.

8 Jul 2015: These use the Qualification and Curriculum Development Agency (QCDA) points scoring system for A Level grades rather than the UCAS tariff, which was the measure used in the Sutton Trust report.

21 Jul 2015: 1. UCAS/DfES Curriculum Development Group. Discussion questions on the 14-19 Education white paper. ... If the question of which subjects should be compulsory at GCSE within the National Curriculum is up for discussion as part of this consultation, then

21 Jul 2015: 5. Views are invited on the approach to curriculum extension described above. ...  On schools’ consideration of the amount of teaching time which can be given to cross curriculum programmes in school timetables.

21 Jul 2015: It is vital that any changes to the 14-19 curriculum are properly funded to ensure that this fundamental principle of equality of access for those in all schools and colleges ... Returning Learners. We welcome the explicit consideration given in the

21 Jul 2015: Agree - While many of us feel Curriculum 2000 has not worked as intended, if a new framework is to be introduced as a way forward post-14, we agree that consideration ... This increased teaching time would give the opportunity for more innovation in