Search

30 Nov 2007: Magazine of Concrete Research. Special Publication on Recent Developments in Yield Line Theory, 13-24.

10 Jul 2007: Furthermore, allowing the bentonite to hydrate for 24 hours or using a high shear mixer to mix the bentonite yielded much higher strengths and lower permeabilities at all ages for the

12 Jul 2007: 06 71.20 0.24 1.09 15.10 2.21 DG2 0.90 0.25 2.10 2.16 9.67 0.68 0.03 0.00 DG3 1.47 ... 29 1.86 0.88 0.94 0.90 DG11 1.24 0.06 1.87 2.29 0.84 1.0 3.53 0.29 DG12 1.24 0.90

26 Aug 2007: Anti-clockwise moment from coins. = M x 9.8 x (1.5 1) = 24.5M. ... Equating the clockwise and anticlockwise moments gives. M = (101.5 – 17.6) / 24.5 = 3.42 grams.

11 Jul 2007: In 2007 Pears [24] tested slabs of similar dimensions but with cube strengths of order 65 MPa. ... Fig. 10 Deflection of column stub relative to adjacent slab – 1.0 % fibres [24].

25 Jul 2007: Figure 24 demonstrates its implementation. This system was shown to be practical and even more effective than the equivalent near-surface mounted (NSM) strengthening scheme due to there being no possibility ... Drilled holes Injected paste. Strengthening

20 Jul 2007: α25 and β1, β2,. β25.However, only 24 design variables are needed to represent each grid design, due to symmetry anddue to a more advanced parameter smoothing process. ... Loading 1 kPa pressure loadingNumber of regions 25Number of design variables

11 Jul 2007: Wood showed the resulting momecould be given as [15]. 6. 22 pxpLxM = 24. , ... then the support moment 12/2pLsm =. and the corresponding span moments are 24.

11 Jul 2007: The solution is then rmin= 0.3510.L with the lower bound collapse load from (2) given by pL.L2/m = 24.36.

2 Jul 2007: 24.7y = 263.2. y = 263.224.7 = 10.7cm 11cm. 4. Mark out y on the card and cut away the excess card. ... 0.49A x (d 1) = 11.025 24.5M. Re-arranging gives. M = (0.49A x (d 1) – 11.025) / 24.5.

11 Jul 2007: 24. Table 2 Comparisons between experimental and predicted load capacities. Source Supporting condition No. ... under Bending and Shear’’, IABSE Periodica, Zurich, 36-II, 1976, 105–120. [24] Exner, H., "On the Effectiveness Factor in Plastic

11 Jul 2007: 12))1(1(24. 23. 2. =hh. hcMwL. p. (19). where h = a / 2L ( = 0.707 a / L) and the width of the yield-lines is equal to a. ... Engineer, Vol. 75, No. 23-24, pp. 403-409. [3] Johansen, K.W., [1962].

6 Feb 2007: Since the 24 m deepexcavation is very close to nearby streets, utilitiesand structures, extensive field monitoring was imple-mented to observe and document conditions aroundexcavation.

18 May 2007: changes. Furtherinvestigation of this result is required. 2.98. 1.49. 0.00. 0.75. 2.24.

11 Jul 2007: 24. Edge Wedge 3 Way Fan. 25. Corner Flap. 26. Corner 6 Way Fan. ... 1 23.5 24.1 6.8 37.2 31.3 18.0 25.6PCOBRAS.

11 Jul 2007: Also shown in the figure are the failure shear stresses predicted by program Response-2000 (R2k) [24]. ... Paul’s Church-Yard, 1678, 24 pp. [3] European Committee for Standardization, CEN, EN 1992-1-1:2004 Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures-

5 Apr 2007: lx ly (24). The outcome of this calculation is. . Nx.

10 Apr 2007: 40 -20 0 2002468. 10. Temperature [oC]. Log a. T. 0 4 8 12 16 20 24.

2 Jul 2007: The new system has an estimated 24 miles of plastic piping running about 10 inches below the surface, from west to east.

2 Apr 2007: 24–33.3“SAMCEF v12.0-03,” Samtech Group, LIEGE science park, Rue des Chasseurs-Ardennais, 8B-4031 Liège (Angleur),.