Search

14 Sep 2006: 24, 18]. Both systems group an image’sspatial features, performing a global annealing optimizationthat propagates the certainty at distinct person-boundaries touncertain areas where those people’s outlines are ambigu-ous. ... 24] P. Tu and J.

14 Jun 2006: 145]; an empirical comparisonof techniques is provided by [24]. The N-gram model captures only local constraints and ignores higher-level structure.Many more sophisticated models have been investigated.

3 Apr 2006: Benavente. The AR face database. TechnicalReport 24, CVC, June 1998. [14] A.

15 Feb 2006: For cases like these, the algorithm of [24] couldbe used to refine the class labeling. ... In: AAAI.(2005) 1508–1513. 24. Kumar, S., Hebert, M.: A hierarchical field framework for unified context-basedclassification.

22 Nov 2006: ãtj = max{atj , amin} (24). whereãtj is the floored scale factor andamin is the scale floor.In this paper,amin of 0.1 was used.

14 Sep 2006: Pattern Analysis andMachine Intelligence, 24(6):748–763, 2002. [22] S. Obdržálek and J. ... ACM Siggraph, 2004. [24] Carsten Rother, Sanjiv Kumar, Vladimir Kolmogorov,and Andrew Blake.

13 Jan 2006: 0.11 9.47 0.09fourier 5.26 0.44 12.24 0.17 9.89 0.08 8.84 0.31.

21 Sep 2006: 21] for upper bodypose estimation. In [24] it is suggested to partition the parameter spaceof a 3D hand model using a multi-resolution grid. ... range. At detection rates of 0.99 the false positiverate for the centre template is 0.24, wheras it is

3 Apr 2006: model. In the case of gaze tracking,the standard calibration process givesn = 80 (nl = 16);with m = 24, the S3GP takes 8s to train (24s including cal-ibration) and requires

22 May 2006: Communications of theACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981. 15. [5] A. H. Gee, R. ... H. Berman. Engineering a freehand 3Dultrasound system. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24:757–777, 2003.