Search

125. Schultz W. Updating dopamine reward signals. Curr Op Neurobiol 23: 229-238, 2013. ... Curr Op Neurobiol 14: 139-147, 2004. 85. Tobler PN, Dickinson A, Schultz W.

Curr Op Pharmacol 5:20-25. Jones, S. and Gutlerner, J.L. (2002). Addictive drugs modify excitatory synaptic control of midbrain dopamine cells.

One op-156 tion was always a gamble; the other was always a safe, guaranteed reward.

WORKING PAPER 1 Uploaded to bioRxiv and SSRN 2. 3 4. Single-dimensional human brain signals for two-dimensional economic choice options 5 6. Leo Chi U Seak, Konstantin Volkmann, Alexandre Pastor-Bernier, Fabian Grabenhorst and 7 Wolfram Schultz 8. 9

Pchoose Gamble 1/1 e1kVGkVs (11). The weight parameter (k) captured the attentional shift toward one op-tion, if significantly 0.5.

For correspondence: c.clopath@. imperial.ac.uk (CC); op210@cam. ac.uk (OP). †These authors contributed.

ette. r op. tio. n c. ho. sen. 0. 100. 50. ... The monkeyspreferred variance-risk at low reward values and showed the op-posite preference at higher reward values (variance-risk avoid-ance), as predicted by their utility function.

NEURONAL REWARD AND DECISION SIGNALS:FROM THEORIES TO DATAWolfram Schultz. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UnitedKingdom. LSchultz W. Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to

Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data Wolfram Schultz Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 3DY, United Kingdom ws234@cam.ac.uk Physiol Rev 95: 853-951, 2015 I.

Accordingly, optogenetic stimulation of striataldopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing neurons introduce op-posing biases in the distribution of choices (43, 44).