Search

20 Feb 2018: error rate of 33.2 %, and for the first and secondorder derivatives the error rates of the classifiers are 33.1 %and 24.2 %, respectively. ... 24.8 42.4par 22.7 13.1 21.7 32.4 32.7 25.2 27.4 45.1.

20 Feb 2018: Per-turn. WER. Per-dialog WER. None 2 6 24 83 % 0 % 0 % Low 4 12 48 83 % 32 % 28 % Med 4 12 48 77 % 46 % 41 % Hi 2 6 24 ... Dataset. Metrics (task & user sat). R2 Significant predictors. ALL User-S 52 % 1.03 Task ALL User-C 60 % 5.29 Task – 1.54

20 Feb 2018: Computer Speech and Language,24(4):562–588. O Tsimhoni, D Smith, and P Green. ... Computer Speech andLanguage, 24(2):150–174.

20 Feb 2018: The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 00:0, 1–24. c 2006, Cambridge University PressDOI: 10.1017/S000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom.

20 Feb 2018: wwpos 24.52 11.29 18.47wspos 11.33 4.91 3.31wpof s 1.13 4.82 8.82wppof s 24.27 6.49 10.54wonset 15.08 0.33 ... 47.3% 52.7%. 75.3% 24.7%. Figure 3: Categorical quality ratings for spectral conversion duration conversion HMM-based contour generation.

20 Feb 2018: 3.3. The agenda-based simulated user. The agenda-based user simulator [24, 25] factorises the user stateinto an agenda and a goal. ... 23] TopTable, “TopTable,” 2012, https://www.toptable.com. [24] J Schatzmann, Statistical User and Error Modelling

20 Feb 2018: In control tests by humanusers, the success rate of the system was 24.5% higher thanthe baseline Lets Go! ... Com-pared to the BASELINE system, the BUDSLETSGO systemimproves the dialogue success rate by 24.5% and the worderror rate by 9.7%.

20 Feb 2018: The static feature set comprised 24 Mel-Cepstral coefficients,logarithm of F0 and aperiodic energy components in five frequency. ... 12 sentences werethen randomly selected to make up a testset for each listener, leadingto 24 wave files pairs (12 for

20 Feb 2018: Corpus Mean (SD) Grades Correlationn Human Auto R p. L 21 24.2 (3.1) 17.1 (1.9). ... 69C 50 24.0 (3.0) 15.6 (3.3). 59. 01. Table 2: Mean (standard deviation) of human andautomated grades, along with Pearson’s correla-tions between the human and

20 Feb 2018: 24, no. 2, pp. 395–429, Apr. 2010. [8] Pierre Lison, “Multi-policy dialogue management,” inProceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference, Strouds-burg, PA, USA, 2011, SIGDIAL ’11, pp. ... 24, no. 4,pp. 562–588, 2010. [18] T Jebara, R Kondor, and A