Search

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Billion-dollar Scientific Scholarship? Posted on October 9, 2007 by pm286. ... If we bring Open Scientific Data into this, as we should, the market goes up by a factor of ten IMO.

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Reclaim our Scientific Scholarship (Beyond the PDF). ... Bookmark the3 Responses to Reclaim our Scientific Scholarship (Beyond the PDF).

17 Jan 2022: Two days ago Nature/Macmillan (heareafter “Nature”) announced a new form of “access” (or better “barrier”) to scientific scholarship – “SciShare”.

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Monthly Archives: November 2010. Posted on November 18, 2010 by pm286. I’d like to congratulate the British Library on releasing its National Bibliography as Open data. This is in conjunction with our JISC-funded Open

17 Jan 2022: It’s now possible. We create the scholarship. We create the meta-data. ... We create the tools. We can reclaim and reinvent the way that scientific scholarship is created and disseminated.

17 Jan 2022: on the reverse of the flower,. reclaim our scholarship. That’s a very simple idea, one’s that possible if a large enough number of people in the world look to ... We can bring back our scholarship where we [emph] control it, and not others.

17 Jan 2022: control. This monopoly is supported through restrictive contracts and cripples innovation in scholarship such as text-mining and data-mining, re-use of factual scientific information and many other necessary actions.

17 Jan 2022: The theme is to look forward to how new technologies, motivations and ways of working might change our practices in scientific scholarship in this decade. ... Protocols and practices for Open Scholarship, driven by bibliography (JISC). (g) Open Climate

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style

17 Jan 2022: Comments on: Billion-dollar Scientific Scholarship? /pmr/2007/10/09/billion-dollar-scientific-scholarship/ A Scientist and the Web Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:46:57 0000 hourly 1

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style

17 Jan 2022: 0000 http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=2753#comment-2626 [.] Reclaim our Scientific Scholarship (Beyond the PDF) We do not own our scholarship. ... It also runs it for itself and officers. The motto of these organizations is: [.] p[…]

17 Jan 2022: Values. It’s distorting values. Ask a librarian/researcher/administrator why scientific publications should be free to everyone and you’ll probably get:. ... I’ve prototyped semantic publication. Ignored. I’ve pushed for a fully Open community of

17 Jan 2022: Does a premiere scientific journal actually request data to be in PDF format? ... It’s about control of the scientific process by organizations outside our control.

17 Jan 2022: W: Ok so I can assume that every important scientific fact is in Wikidata? ... We’ve set up ContentMine – a non-profit supporting machine reading and analysis of scholarship.

17 Jan 2022: Peter Suber seems to have connections everywhere and picked up this really exciting post about how there is a wide-open market to completely restructure scientific publishing.

17 Jan 2022: Frank Fraser Darling, the great naturalist, described the Highlands as  “a devastated landscape” – and a “wet desert”, And it’s my contention that, unless we stop it, scientific scholarship – research as ... Two days ago Nature/Macmillan

17 Jan 2022: It’s now possible. We create the scholarship. We create the meta-data. ... We create the tools. We can reclaim and reinvent the way that scientific scholarship is created and disseminated.

17 Jan 2022: Two days ago Nature/Macmillan (heareafter “Nature”) announced a new form of “access” (or better “barrier”) to scientific scholarship – “SciShare”.

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Paul Miller speaking at UCC. Posted on October 9, 2007 by pm286. I should have blogged this earlier but was too wrapped up in my talk for yesterday. Still if anyone in the Cambridge area is reading this, Paul Miller of Talis

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Author Archives:Posted on November 17, 2010 by pm286. I’m going to an important and exciting meeting in January which looks at new ways of scholarly communication (https://sites.google.com/site/beyondthepdf/ ). Unlike some

17 Jan 2022: Peter Suber seems to have connections everywhere and picked up this really exciting post about how there is a wide-open market to completely restructure scientific publishing.

17 Jan 2022: Peter Suber seems to have connections everywhere and picked up this really exciting post about how there is a wide-open market to completely restructure scientific publishing.

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style

17 Jan 2022: 930 Bill Hooker points to an initiative by Scientific American to help collaborative science. ... of scientific data./p/blockquote pPMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship),

17 Jan 2022: 21. Pa s. There must be many other stories of scientific discoveries hidden in the record like this. ... I got very annoyed at the Glasgow meeting last year on digital scholarship when a smooth vendor of repositories told us how easy it was to put

17 Jan 2022: See The power of the Scientific eThesis, a combined audio, video and screenshow. ... Destroy the pernicious pseudo-science of citation metrics. Reclaim our scholarship./p /pmr/2007/06/15/the-power-of-the-scientific-ethesis/feed/ 0 "open access" – some

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. Paul Miller on the Web of Data. Paul visited us today (Paul Miller speaking at UCC) and gave a beautiful presentation on the Web of Data. Literally beautiful. He had worked very hard on preparing it and it flowed

17 Jan 2022: Frank Fraser Darling, the great naturalist, described the Highlands as  “a devastated landscape” – and a “wet desert”, And it’s my contention that, unless we stop it, scientific scholarship – research as ... Scientific knowledge is, I

17 Jan 2022: Two days ago Nature/Macmillan (heareafter “Nature”) announced a new form of “access” (or better “barrier”) to scientific scholarship – “SciShare”.

17 Jan 2022: Peter Suber seems to have connections everywhere and picked up this really exciting post about how there is a wide-open market to completely restructure scientific publishing.

17 Jan 2022: already removed by fair use) to that which removes all the permission barriers that might interfere with scholarship. ... Perhaps. Scholarship and scientific practice. Scientists will be able to archive their own data, funded by the institution.

17 Jan 2022: to a situation where these scientific decisions are made in ways that don’t become part of the database record. ... Two examples where I discuss not-bad-at-all scientific literature:. Open Notebook Science.

17 Jan 2022: PMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style that I have done for Wikipedia. ... It’s part of the future of scientific information and data-driven science.

17 Jan 2022: Where are the community standards for acceptable scientific practice? They cannot come from commercial publishers – they can only come from societies – national or international. ... No-one at the top cares about interoperability, quality. It’s the

17 Jan 2022: See The power of the Scientific eThesis, a combined audio, video and screenshow. ... I am a chemist at the University of Cambridge with a major research interest in eScience – the UK term for the combination of scientific research and scholarship with

17 Jan 2022: The theme is to look forward to how new technologies, motivations and ways of working might change our practices in scientific scholarship in this decade. ... Protocols and practices for Open Scholarship, driven by bibliography (JISC). (g) Open Climate

17 Jan 2022: control. This monopoly is supported through restrictive contracts and cripples innovation in scholarship such as text-mining and data-mining, re-use of factual scientific information and many other necessary actions. ... that interesting developments in

17 Jan 2022: This is a major impediment to the progress of scholarship in the digital age. ... PMR: The article tries not to be too polemic and to review objectively the area of Open Data (in scientific scholarship), in the style that I have done for Wikipedia.

17 Jan 2022: A Scientist and the Web. What do these columns mean? (chemical help required). In Quixote we are writing a semantic infrastructure for computational chemistry. That means we have to create precise and consistent annotation for components. The

17 Jan 2022: Perhaps. Scholarship and scientific practice. Scientists will be able to archive their own data, funded by the institution. ... But are universities the best place to put scientific data? Can they all support chemistry, archaeology, astronomy, etc?

17 Jan 2022: On Monday I shall be taking at Colorado State University on the theme on “Digital preservation of the scientific record” – probably not the precise title. ... I got very annoyed at the Glasgow meeting last year on digital scholarship when a smooth

17 Jan 2022: Open-bibliography. This is extremely exciting as well because bibliography is key to our management and navigation of the scientific literature. ... As a result we hope to change the way in which science is published and its outputs are managed.] We see

17 Jan 2022: Two days ago Nature/Macmillan (heareafter “Nature”) announced a new form of “access” (or better “barrier”) to scientific scholarship – “SciShare”. ... In what way does this announce “that Nature makes the rules for the scientific

17 Jan 2022: You have often said the scientific community should "take back our scholarship", but I think the first step is for the scientific community to take responsibility for our scholarship. ... You have often said the scientific community should “take back

17 Jan 2022: NO! It’s a living semantic resource. That because we can interpret it, enhance it and use it as the underpinning of our scholarship. ... And as Wikipedia is Open I can use all of theose for personal enlightenment or scholarship.

17 Jan 2022: I am a chemist at the University of Cambridge with a major research interest in eScience – the UK term for the combination of scientific research and scholarship with the new opportunities ... In chemistry much of the primary scientific information

17 Jan 2022: And I will show you a typical example of the irresponsible destruction of scientific information. ... You have often said the scientific community should “take back our scholarship”, but I think the first step is for the scientific community to take