Search

17 Jan 2022: I came across your blog because I try to keep up-to-date on the concept of open scholarship, and I was alerted through Google Alerts about it. ... right/ ). So George and Royce:. Given these examples of open scholarship, we should be able to recognize

17 Jan 2022: I don’t know much about the data, but I will get myself a login and have a look. ... So – assuming the Mendeley data falls into this, that is what I am talking about for raw data.

17 Jan 2022: Comments on: The ABCD of Open Scholarship /pmr/2010/09/02/the-abcd-of-open-scholarship/ A Scientist and the Web Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:36:34 0000 hourly 1 ... https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.3 By: Twitter Trackbacks for Unilever Centre for Molecular Informatics

17 Jan 2022: Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving forces in the scholarship process. ... pHi Peter. Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving

17 Jan 2022: AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has created anti-scholarship initiatives – I wrote to OUP about the iniquity of the “PRISM” alliance in 2007. ... AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has

17 Jan 2022: Where they had reviewed in detail the statements made in, or reported about, the IPCC report. ... As to agenda, I’m mainly hoping to listen and hear from you people about the path and obstacles to more open science publication routes, much along the

17 Jan 2022: They often lead and they care deeply about the ownership of scholarship./li lia href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hey"strongTony Hey/strong/a Yet another computer scientist – at ... It was obviou to anyone who thought about the future that

17 Jan 2022: Open Access, Open Data are not about business models, but the soul of scholarship. ... Harvard (and others) “just declared” autonomy of their scholarship. And tell the world about it.

17 Jan 2022: Three of us (Carl Bergstrom, Johan Bollen and me) proposed a session on ” reclaim our scholarship” (RoS) and this took place on the Saturday (about 15 people came). ... Andrew Marr from the BBC talked about the death of journalism, how this would

17 Jan 2022: Open Access, Open Data are not about business models, but the soul of scholarship. ... Harvard (and others) “just declared” autonomy of their scholarship. And tell the world about it.

17 Jan 2022: Most scholarship is NOT Open. That must be changed. SCHOLARSHIP. The practice and output of scholars. ... I strongly support the metaphor of a commons for #scholrev. I don’t see it as a cathedral, but a bazaar ( ). I’ll blog later about the model

17 Jan 2022: I shall blog this. If you care about Open scholarship you have to be seriously concerned. ... Do university libraries care? They’d rather buy things than fight. Overall I worry seriously about Open Scholarship.

17 Jan 2022: Three of us (Carl Bergstrom, Johan Bollen and me) proposed a session on ” reclaim our scholarship” (RoS) and this took place on the Saturday (about 15 people came). ... Provide useful information about the thing when its URI is dereferenced, using

17 Jan 2022: There will be enough rejoicing this week about the progress of OA – that’sfine. ... The good thing about the RCUK and other initiatives are that they are serious statements of intent.

17 Jan 2022: I think it’s an incredible resource. So, I don’t have to worry about the legal repercussions of using the system (yet). ... I am prepared to believe the assertion about China. There is a hunger for scholarship.

17 Jan 2022: for a combination of resources, philosophy, advocacy that support my scholarship (my current working definition of the “library of the future”). ... What is important here is not just that Google has revolutionized our thinking about information, but

17 Jan 2022: And even more angry about the lobbying, the politics that tries to close down open efforts. ... Several are about Open Scholarship, others about semantics. One of the broadest papers is on Open Bibliography:.

17 Jan 2022: I can’t remember the exact title – but something about the challenge from the publishers. ... I’ve sent this in – not sure whether the panellists have seen it so I shan’t put it here but it’s about the #scholarlypoor.

17 Jan 2022: I don’t know much about the data, but I will get myself a login and have a look. ... So here we make requests to data providers, publishers, etc about the Openness of their data.

17 Jan 2022: We must reclaim our scholarship /pmr/2012/11/14/openaccess-opendata-in-perth-au-my-talk-on-open-scholarship-i-we-must-reclaim-our-scholarship/ A Scientist and the Web Sat, ... I came across your blog because I try to keep up-to-date on the concept of

17 Jan 2022: Where they had reviewed in detail the statements made in, or reported about, the IPCC report. ... Imagine that the world’s scholarship was referenced by an open-bibliography which was available pervasively.

17 Jan 2022: wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=2583 – view page – cached « #solo10: GreenChainReaction – volunteers start to process patents The ABCD of Open Scholarship » Tweets about this link [.] p[…] Unilever Centre ... ABCD of Open Scholarship »

17 Jan 2022: They often lead and they care deeply about the ownership of scholarship. ... They have always had a major concern about the quality of scientific experiments and how these are reported and were (I think) the first ISU to move towards effective mandating

17 Jan 2022: and from James. Hi Peter. Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving forces in the scholarship process. ... My takeaway from your post is that librarians and academics need to work more closely

17 Jan 2022: is. Why and how can we make Scholarship Semantic? [If you switch off at “Semantics” trust me and keep reading… There’s a lot here about changing the world.]. ... I am really excited about the #scholrev hackathon program put together as

17 Jan 2022: I’ve blogged earlier about the use of text, but what about graphics? ... I talked about the project in my paper for the ETD 07 conference.

17 Jan 2022: organisation, produces no collective will, but only a striving to bring about the satisfaction of the instinctual needs subject to the observance of the pleasure principle.”. ... But academia does not care about the common wo/man. It looks inward, not

17 Jan 2022: It was obviou to anyone who thought about the future that electronic publication was coming. ... am. Hi Peter. Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving forces in the scholarship process.

17 Jan 2022: The good thing about the RCUK and other initiatives are that they are serious statements of intent. ... I think the stresses in academic scholarship are building with every year of inaction and cannot be long contained.br / The good thing about the RCUK

17 Jan 2022: How would that work? What about copyright for the icon? Should it be in the public domain? ... Many thoughtful comments here. Close to my own heart is the concern about the lack of supplemental info – the raw experimental stuff.

17 Jan 2022: What does “life” mean (for a tissue that is dead). This couldn’t happen in scholarship, because it is run by respectable academics who care about the accuracy of statements and ... It’s been said for 15 years (or more) that the responsibility for

17 Jan 2022: Several are about Open Scholarship, others about semantics. One of the broadest papers is on Open Bibliography:. ... And we’ve got the software already written. Conv: Hmm, Hmm. PMR: I’ll be writing more about the articles in this issue.

17 Jan 2022: Some commentators have described it as an act of war by the publishing industry on the scholarly community. ... AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has created anti-scholarship initiatives – I wrote to OUP about the iniquity

17 Jan 2022: If anyone knows better addresses for the addressees, please could you forward it. ... AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has created anti-scholarship initiatives – I wrote to you about the iniquity of the “PRISM” alliance

17 Jan 2022: I can’t remember the exact title – but something about the challenge from the publishers. ... So now the gory and unedifying details. I’ve blogged about the Oxford meeting and Elsevier’s offer to re-open my concern on textmining (after the facile