Search

17 Jan 2022: We must reclaim our scholarship /pmr/2012/11/14/openaccess-opendata-in-perth-au-my-talk-on-open-scholarship-i-we-must-reclaim-our-scholarship/ A Scientist and the Web Sat, ... I came across your blog because I try to keep up-to-date on the concept of

17 Jan 2022: wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/?p=2583 – view page – cached « #solo10: GreenChainReaction – volunteers start to process patents The ABCD of Open Scholarship » Tweets about this link [.] p[…] Unilever Centre ... ABCD of Open Scholarship »

17 Jan 2022: They often lead and they care deeply about the ownership of scholarship. ... They have always had a major concern about the quality of scientific experiments and how these are reported and were (I think) the first ISU to move towards effective mandating

17 Jan 2022: and from James. Hi Peter. Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving forces in the scholarship process. ... My takeaway from your post is that librarians and academics need to work more closely

17 Jan 2022: is. Why and how can we make Scholarship Semantic? [If you switch off at “Semantics” trust me and keep reading… There’s a lot here about changing the world.]. ... I am really excited about the #scholrev hackathon program put together as

17 Jan 2022: I’ve blogged earlier about the use of text, but what about graphics? ... I talked about the project in my paper for the ETD 07 conference.

17 Jan 2022: organisation, produces no collective will, but only a striving to bring about the satisfaction of the instinctual needs subject to the observance of the pleasure principle.”. ... But academia does not care about the common wo/man. It looks inward, not

17 Jan 2022: It was obviou to anyone who thought about the future that electronic publication was coming. ... am. Hi Peter. Thanks for your post. You speak truth to power about libraries and missed opportunities to be driving forces in the scholarship process.

17 Jan 2022: The good thing about the RCUK and other initiatives are that they are serious statements of intent. ... I think the stresses in academic scholarship are building with every year of inaction and cannot be long contained.br / The good thing about the RCUK

17 Jan 2022: How would that work? What about copyright for the icon? Should it be in the public domain? ... Many thoughtful comments here. Close to my own heart is the concern about the lack of supplemental info – the raw experimental stuff.

17 Jan 2022: What does “life” mean (for a tissue that is dead). This couldn’t happen in scholarship, because it is run by respectable academics who care about the accuracy of statements and ... It’s been said for 15 years (or more) that the responsibility for

17 Jan 2022: Several are about Open Scholarship, others about semantics. One of the broadest papers is on Open Bibliography:. ... And we’ve got the software already written. Conv: Hmm, Hmm. PMR: I’ll be writing more about the articles in this issue.

17 Jan 2022: Some commentators have described it as an act of war by the publishing industry on the scholarly community. ... AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has created anti-scholarship initiatives – I wrote to OUP about the iniquity

17 Jan 2022: If anyone knows better addresses for the addressees, please could you forward it. ... AAP. [This is not the first time that the publishing industry has created anti-scholarship initiatives – I wrote to you about the iniquity of the “PRISM” alliance

17 Jan 2022: I can’t remember the exact title – but something about the challenge from the publishers. ... So now the gory and unedifying details. I’ve blogged about the Oxford meeting and Elsevier’s offer to re-open my concern on textmining (after the facile