Search

Search Funnelback University

Search powered by Funnelback
1 - 10 of 88 search results for 十V信 15625141611 where 0 match all words and 88 match some words.
  1. Results that match 2 of 3 words

  2. Dr Dror Weil | Faculty of History University of Cambridge

    https://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/people/dr-dror-weil
    Toggle navigation. Main navigation. Study. Research. About. People. Dr Dror Weil. University Assistant Professor in History of Early Modern Asia (East Asia and the Islamicate world). Fellow of King's College. Image. I am a historian of pre-modern Asia, with a particular interest in scientific and other textual exchanges between the Islamicate world and China; cultural, intellectual and social histories of Late Imperial China; histories of medicine and science in Asia; and, histories of the book and textuality. I studied for my BA degree in East Asian Studies and Economics at Tel Aviv University, and for an MA degree in History at National Chengchi University (國立政治大學) in Taipei. I earned a PhD degree from Princeton University with a dissertation titled: "The Vicissitudes of Late Imperial China's Accommodation of Arabo-Persian Knowledge of the Natural World, 16th-18th Centuries" in 2016. I was a recipient of the Thomas Arthur Arnold Fund for Excellence in Historical Research fellowship at the Zvi Yavetz School of Historical Studies, Tel Aviv University in 2017 and held postdoctoral fellowships at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin and the Berlin Center for the History of Knowledge
  3. FaradayPaper21Japanese

    https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/FaradayPaper21Japanese.pdf
    21 Apr 2022: Paper 21. 宗教と科学の勃興 ピーター・ハリソン. Peter Harrison. F a r a d a y P a p e r s. 要旨. 科学と宗教は歴史的に敵対関係. にあり、宗教は本質的に科学を. 歓迎しない、というような見方. がよくなされる。本論文は、こ. のような見方に反論し、近代科. 学の出現において宗教が積極的. な役割を果たした様な様相を. 示す。そして宗教的な考察がい. かに主要な科学者たちを動機付. け、科学の核となる哲学的前提. を提供し、科学的方法と内容を. 形成し、科学に社会的正当性を. 与える価値の源となったことを. 明らかにする。. 科学と宗教は歴史的に、よくても冷え切っ. た関係にあったというのがよくある見方であ. る。俗説では、ガリレオとカトリック教会の. 緊張関係や、最近の宗教的動機による進化論. の否定は、繰り返し起こる対立の典型的なパ. ターンとされる。しかし、ここ数十年、科学史家た. ちはこの「対立論」 学会ではこう呼ばれている. を入念に少しずつ突き崩してゆき、その労苦の結果、.
  4. Letter to Linyi 12 November for export

    https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~mb139/documents/Chinese%20documents/letter%20to%20Linyi%2012-11-09.pdf
    12 Nov 2009: 因为你们决定采用小组讨论会的教书的方法,上次我解释了一下我怎么样在剑桥教其他人准备讲课的方法。但是如果你们想要最有效的讨论会,不只决定于讲课人的准备情况,而且也决定于听课人积极地参加。听小组讨论会跟听大课
  5. FaradayPaper12BerrySimplifiedChinese _2_

    https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/resources/Faraday%20Papers/Faraday%20Paper%2012%20Berry_Ch-Simp.pdf
    1 Aug 2008: 创造与进化创造与进化创造与进化创造与进化,,,,不是创造或进化不是创造或进化不是创造或进化不是创造或进化. 比利著比利著比利著比利著. 摘要摘要摘要摘要. 本文指出,创造与进化并非对立的观念。"创造"是一个神学名词,指一切事物都源于创. 造者。"进化论"则指当代人对神如何产生多元生物的理解。我们需要这两种观点,才能. 解释科学家所观察的现象。. 圣经开宗明义地提及宇宙的创造:"起初神创造天地"。乍看之下,这似乎是简单、明确的陈述,但却在过去数个世纪引发了没完没了的论争。神何时创造天地?怎么创造?使用什么材料?神是否真是万物的创始者与设计者?这些问题在十八世纪末愈显尖锐,因为当时科学家发现地球远比一般所假设的六千年更古老 这假设是根据圣经的年代表所推论的 [例如,创四;太一 1-16;路三 23-38] 。
  6. C:\Users\Monte Christo\AppData\Local\Temp\msoC52.tmp

    https://www.ames.cam.ac.uk/files/Michaelmas%202020%20Cambridge%20Chinese%20Studies%20Newsletter.pdf
    11 Dec 2020: I N S I D E T H I S. I S S U E :. F A C U L T Y O F A S I A N. A N D M I D D L E. E A S T E R N S T U D I E S ,. C A M B R I D G E. Cambridge Chinese Studies. Newsletter D E C E M B E R 2 0 2 0 V O L U M E 2 I S S U E 1. Welcome 1. Seminar Series. Michaelmas 2020. 2. —. 3. Interviews with. Prof. Geoffrey. Sampson,. Prof. Roel. Sterckx, and. Emma Wu. 4. —. 11. Student Updates. 12. CUCF Updates. 13. Staff Updates 14. Graduate. Student Updates. 15. —. 16. Where Are. They Now? 17. Notices and. Advertisements. 19. Life Outside the. Library. 18. has been, for many of us, a tougher term than most. With such limitations on socialising, travelling, and even on accessing archival re-sources, I’m delighted to introduce a new sec-tion to our newsletter: Life Outside the Li-brary, where we feature the hobbies and ven-tures our own staff and students have taken up, re-visited, or managed to continue during the lockdown. There is more to all of us than just being learners or teachers of Chinese language, history, and culture (I hope!) and so this feature will hopefully inspire us all to do more of what we love in these trying times. And finally, our own second year cohort have even shown that a pandemic is no obstacle for starting a new
  7. Chinese bibliography for website

    https://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/files/brazelton-chinese-bibliography.pdf
    5 Apr 2021: 1. Mass Vaccination: Citizens’ Bodies and State Power in Modern China. Bibliography of Chinese Sources. Author’s Note on Style. I use traditional and simplified characters according to the form used in the original. source; likewise with pinyin or Wade-Giles romanization methods. Abbreviations YHMRR Historical Materials Reading Room, Yunnan Provincial Library,. Kunming, Yunnan, China SMDRR Modern Documents Reading Room, Shanghai Library, Shanghai, China. Primary sources. Beijing shi jiehebing fangzhi suo 北京市结核病防治所. “Ertong yao fanglao: Kuai. zhong kajiemiao” ⼉童要防痨 快种卡介苗 [Children must prevent tuberculosis:. Quickly get the BCG vaccine]. Poster, ca. 1965. National Library of Medicine Chinese Public Health Posters: Prevention of Diseases. https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101561047-img. “Ben she jin yao qi shi” 本社緊要啓事 [This publisher’s critical note]. Tongji yixue jikan. 同濟醫學季刊 7, no. 3 (March 31, 1940). Accessed via SMDRR. Cai Hongdao 蔡宏道. “Huoluan yimiao shi zenyang zhizao de” 霍亂疫苗是怎樣製造的. [How the cholera vaccine is made]. Yichao yuekan 醫潮⽉刊 1, no. 8 (1947): 9. Accessed via SMDRR. Chen Shichang
  8. FaradayPaper12BerryTraditionalChinese

    https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/resources/Faraday%20Papers/Faraday%20Paper%2012%20Berry_Ch-Trad.pdf
    1 Aug 2008: 創造與進化創造與進化創造與進化創造與進化,,,,不是創造或進化不是創造或進化不是創造或進化不是創造或進化. 比利著比利著比利著比利著. 摘要摘要摘要摘要. 本文指出,創造與進化并非對立的觀念。「創造」是一個神學名詞,指一切事物都源於. 創造者。「進化論」則指當代人對神如何產生多元生物的理解。我們需要這兩種觀點,. 才能解釋科學家所觀察的現象。. 聖經開宗明義地提及宇宙的創造:「起初神創造天地」。乍看之下,這似乎是簡單、明確的陳述,但卻在過去數個世紀引發了沒完沒了的論爭。神何時創造天地?怎么創造?使用什麼材料?神是否真是萬物的創始者與設計者?這些問題在十八世紀末愈顯尖銳,因為當時科學家發現地球遠比一般所假設的六千年更古老 這假設是根據聖經的年代表所推論的 [例如,創四;太一 1-16;路三 23-38] 。
  9. FaradayPaper8TraditionalChinese

    https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/resources/Faraday%20Papers/Faraday%20Paper%208%20White_Ch-Trad.pdf
    20 Dec 2010: FARADAY PAPER 8. 地球的年齡地球的年齡地球的年齡地球的年齡 羅伯特羅伯特羅伯特羅伯特.懷特懷特懷特懷特. Robert S. White 「我們看不見起源的蹤跡,也看不見未來的憧憬」,Hutton 1788。 「我是阿拉法,我是俄梅戛;我是首先的,我是末後的;我是初,我是終。」 啓二十二13. 摘要摘要摘要摘要. 根據最可靠的估計,地球物質的年齡是四十五億六千六百萬年 準確度高達數百萬年 。. 宇宙的年齡則是三倍 一百三十七億年 。雖然地球史上的大部份階段都有生物,現代. 人的歷史則只佔了地球年齡的數十萬分之一。本文探討鑑定地質年齡的科學根據,地球. 年齡的歷史性及近代觀點,以及聖經與科學證據對神學觀點的影響。
  10. Japanese - 2011 with clarification

    https://www.ames.cam.ac.uk/files/transliteration-japanese.pdf
    9 Jul 2018: Japanese. Romanization System. The modified Hepburn system of romanization as employed in Kenkyusha’s New Japanese-English Dictionary (3rd and later editions) is used. For the syllabic nasal, n is always used preceding b, m, and p. Romanization for words of foreign (i.e., non-Japanese) origin follows the American National Standard system for the romanization of Japanese; e.g., ベトナム(Betonamu); ヴェトナム(Vetonamu). Word Reading. The reading of Japanese words follows standard Japanese language usage, insofar as this can be determined from standard Japanese dictionaries. A current modern reading is preferred to an obsolete one, except where the usage of standard authorities has established a particular reading for a particular name or book title. The characters 日本 are romanized as Nihon unless the usage of standard authorities has established a particular reading; e.g., Dai Nippon Teikoku, Nippon’ichi, Nippon eitaigura, etc. If there are various readings, the reading that appears most frequently in dictionaries is used. Capitalization. 1. Personal Names: (a) Capitalize each word of a personal name, except the particle no. Sugawara no Takasue no Musume 菅原孝標女. (b) Capitalize title and terms of address,
  11. FaradayPaper9

    https://www.faraday.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/resources/Faraday%20Papers/Faraday%20Paper%209%20McGrath_JAP.pdf
    19 Jun 2013: FARADAY PAPER 9. 科学は神を殺したか科学は神を殺したか科学は神を殺したか科学は神を殺したか. アリスター・マクグラスアリスター・マクグラスアリスター・マクグラスアリスター・マクグラス. 要旨 本論は、リチャード・ドーキンスらがしたような自然科学の極度な無神論的見方を検討し、それが、知的信憑性の点で. も実証的論拠の点でも、非常に問題を含むことを指摘する。かつて科学を一般の人に普及させた功労者の彼は、今. や、非常に多くの科学者が信仰を持っているという明らかな事実を無視して、宗教を論駁するための最も粗雑な手段と. して科学を用いている。彼は単なる反宗教的宣伝家になってしまったのだろうか。ドーキンスの無神論はいわば知的マ. ジックテープで科学に貼り付けられたようなもので、科学的方法の提唱者に期待される厳密な証拠を欠いている。. 私はかつて、無神論者だった。1960年代にベルファストで育. ったのだが、その間に、神は子供だましの幻想に過ぎず、年寄り.

Search history

Recently clicked results

Recently clicked results

Your click history is empty.

Recent searches

Recent searches

Your search history is empty.