Search

10 Feb 2004: 5 February. Alan Douglas. Seismology and test ban verification. 12 February.

7 Jul 2004: 2. The Experiments. [3] To test these ideas we conducted a series of experi-ments in a Perspex tank with internal horizontal dimensionsof 2 cm by 30 cm, and a depth

9 Mar 2004: 3. Results. To test our theory, we compare our predictionsto measured tip radii in directional solidificationexperiments with SCN-acetone [21].

9 Mar 2004: Some test cases were also run with a direct solver for theblock tri-diagonal system. ... other runs with small C, as an additional test of the predictivepower of the numerical code and the SW approximation.

9 Mar 2004: difference solution, so thepractical gain is marginal, except for accuracy tests.

9 Feb 2004: Anextensive numerical investigation was carried out by Bonnecazeet al. (1995) and their numerical resultsagree well with experiments undertaken to test the theoretical model.

9 Mar 2004: Numerical tests indicated that this artificial term affected thedistance of propagation by less than 1% in the cases presented below. ... On the other hand, tests(not shown here) indicate that the direct use of the τTML values as the ‘correct’ones

9 Mar 2004: A test of the ice thickness algorithm using labora-tory experiments in which the growth rate is measured inde-pendently. ... To test when natural sea ice suffers thisinstability, we also plotted the buoy-derived values of f# andhDS on Figure 7a.

9 Feb 2004: of. 3. Experiments. 3.1 Experimental arrangements. To test the validity of our results and to evaluate the relationshipbetween and U, we conducted a series of experiments in a 9.4Um

9 Mar 2004: 2001). The objectives are (a) to test the ability of the numerical solver to provideresults for the stratified ambient, and (b) to obtain additional data for the verificationof the present SW